{"id":"linked-art/api/bibliography","relativePath":"linked-art/api/bibliography.md","title":"Linked Art: Bibliography","markdown":"# Linked Art: Bibliography\n\n**Last refreshed:** 2026-07-06\n\nSource: Linked Art bibliography resource list, with project-local summary and implementation notes. This is a project summary; the upstream bibliography and cited works remain authoritative.\n\n## Purpose\n\nThe Linked Art bibliography collects scholarly publications, book chapters, technical reports, theses, and research outputs that discuss Linked Art, LOUD, CIDOC-CRM-aligned cultural heritage data, community practice, semantic annotation, and cross-collection discovery.\n\nThis page gives Meta Museum a citation backbone for evaluator-facing claims. It is especially useful when we need to explain why Linked Art, LOUD, IIIF-adjacent practice, provenance modeling, image-archive workflows, and cross-collection discovery are established cultural heritage research directions rather than project-local inventions.\n\n## Version Context\n\nLinked Art 1.0 was officially released in February 2025. Publications from 2024 are close to the stabilized model, while older publications may describe earlier development phases. Use older citations for historical/community context, not as proof of every current 1.0 API detail.\n\n## 2025\n\n- Dressen, A. (2025). Cultural Heritage Data for Research - An Introduction. Open Library of Humanities, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.18710\n- Middle, S., Aristeidou, M., Barker, E., Pett, D., & Alcock, S. (2025). Discovering Object Stories: Linking Unstructured Museum Data Through Semantic Annotation. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.273\n\n## 2024\n\n- Cross, M. (2024). Linked Open Data & Ontology Trends in the Cultural Heritage Sector: Current Projects, Future Directions, and the Case for Provenance [Master's thesis, University of North Carolina]. https://doi.org/10.17615/7maj-3220\n- Daquino, M. (2024). Photo Archives and Linked Open Data. The Added Value. Open Library of Humanities, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.15232\n- Hou, Y., & Kenderdine, S. (2024). Ontology-based knowledge representation for traditional martial arts. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae005\n- McInerney, P., & O'Neill, B. (2024). The Art of Memory: Archiving Street Art using the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(3), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.177\n- Raemy, J. A. (2024). Linked Open Usable Data for Cultural Heritage: Perspectives on Community Practices and Semantic Interoperability [Doctoral Thesis, University of Basel]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14716/148352\n- Raemy, J. A., & Sanderson, R. (2024). Analysis of the Usability of Automatically Enriched Cultural Heritage Data. In F. Moral-Andres, E. Merino-Gomez, & P. Reviriego (Eds.), Decoding Cultural Heritage: A Critical Dissection and Taxonomy of Human Creativity through Digital Tools (pp. 69-93). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57675-1_4\n- Roberts, R., Abdul Jabbar, J., Dykes, N., Jones, H., Peszko, M., Madella, M., Orengo, H., & Petrie, C. (2024). Historical maps as a multifaceted LOUD resource. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.108595\n- Sanderson, R. (2024). Implementing Linked Art in a Multi-Modal Database for Cross-Collection Discovery. Open Library of Humanities, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.15407\n\n## 2023\n\n- Cornut, M., Raemy, J. A., & Spiess, F. (2023). Annotations as Knowledge Practices in Image Archives: Application of Linked Open Usable Data and Machine Learning. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 16(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625301\n- Felsing, U., Fornaro, P., Frischknecht, M., & Raemy, J. A. (2023). Community and Interoperability at the Core of Sustaining Image Archives. Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications, 5(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.5617/dhnbpub.10649\n- Manz, M. C., Raemy, J. A., & Fornaro, P. (2023). Recommended 3D Workflow for Digital Heritage Practices. Archiving Conference, 20, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2023.20.1.5\n- Raemy, J. A. (2023). Characterising the IIIF and Linked Art Communities: Survey report (p. 29) [Report]. University of Basel. https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep95340\n- Raemy, J. A., Gray, T., Collinson, A., & Page, K. R. (2023). Enabling Participatory Data Perspectives for Image Archives through a Linked Art Workflow. In A. Baillot, W. Scholger, T. Tasovac, & G. Vogeler (Eds.), Digital Humanities 2023 Book of Abstracts (Vol. 2023, pp. 515-516). Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations. https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep95099\n\n## 2022\n\n- Middle, S., Horne, R., McMeekin, D. A., Zuanni, C., & Butterworth, A. (2022). Geographies of Place in Digital Art History. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 16(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2022.0279\n- Raemy, J. A. (2022). Ameliorer la valorisation des donnees du patrimoine culturel grace au Linked Open Usable Data (LOUD). In N. Lasolle, O. Bruneau, & J. Lieber (Eds.), Actes des journees humanites numeriques et Web semantique (pp. 132-149). https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep89725\n- Rother, L., Koss, M., & Mariani, F. (2022). Taking Care of History: Toward a Politics of Provenance Linked Open Data in Museums. Perspectives on Data. https://www.artic.edu/digital-publications/37/perspectives-on-data/25/taking-care-of-history\n\n## 2021\n\n- Delmas-Glass, E. (2021). Lessons learned from digital collaborations: Standards and descriptive practices. In L. A. Stuart, T. F. R. Clareson, & J. Ray (Eds.), Economic Considerations for Libraries, Archives and Museums (pp. 61-76). Routledge.\n- France, F. G., & Forsberg, A. (2021). Addressing the Challenges of Interoperability and Cultural Heritage Data. Archiving Conference, 18, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2021.1.0.8\n- Kotis, K., Angelis, S., Chondrogianni, M., & Marini, E. (2021). Children's art museum collections as Linked Open Data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/10.1504/IJMSO.2021.117107\n\n## 2020\n\n- Delmas-Glass, E., & Sanderson, R. (2020). Fostering a community of PHAROS scholars through the adoption of open standards. Art Libraries Journal, 45(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/alj.2019.32\n- Page, K. R., Delmas-Glass, E., Beaudet, D., Norling, S., Rother, L., & Hansli, T. (2020). Linked Art: Networking Digital Collections and Scholarship. Digital Humanities 2020 Book of Abstracts, 504-509. https://dh2020.adho.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/139_LinkedArtNetworkingDigitalCollectionsandScholarship.html\n- Paquet, A. P. (2020). Linked Data and Linked Open Data Projects for Libraries, Archives and Museums: Constructing Pathways to Information Discovery and Cultural Heritage Sector Collaboration. Johns Hopkins Libraries. http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/63875\n\n## 2019\n\n- Wildenhaus, K. (2019). The Possibilities of Constructing Linked Data for Art Exhibition Histories. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 38(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1086/702890\n\n## 2018\n\n- Alexiev, V. (2018). Museum Linked Open Data: Ontologies, Datasets, Projects. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 8, 19-50. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2018.8.1\n- Fink, E. E. (2018). American Art Collaborative Linked Open Data Initiative (p. 81) [Overview and Recommendations for Good Practices]. American Art Collaborative. https://hdl.handle.net/10088/106410\n- Newbury, D. (2018). LOUD: Linked Open Usable Data and linked.art. 2018 CIDOC Conference, 1-11. https://cidoc.mini.icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/03/CIDOC2018_paper_153.pdf\n\n## Meta Museum Notes\n\nUse the 2024-2025 entries for current Linked Art, LOUD, semantic annotation, provenance, and cross-collection-discovery claims. Use 2018-2023 entries to explain the history of Linked Art, IIIF/Linked Art community practice, PHAROS and American Art Collaborative lineage, image-archive workflows, and broader museum linked-data adoption.\n\nThis bibliography supports evaluator-facing narrative and citations; it should not replace the official Linked Art API/model documentation for exact conformance rules.\n\n## Test Ideas\n\n- Keep evaluator pages that make broad LOUD/Linked Art claims tied to at least one current bibliography entry.\n- Prefer 2024-2025 citations for current conformance or production-readiness claims.\n- Use older entries for historical context, community lineage, and research background.\n- Keep exact API behavior anchored to the local Linked Art API reference notes rather than bibliography summaries.\n","sections":[{"level":2,"heading":"Purpose","anchor":"purpose"},{"level":2,"heading":"Version Context","anchor":"version-context"},{"level":2,"heading":"2025","anchor":"2025"},{"level":2,"heading":"2024","anchor":"2024"},{"level":2,"heading":"2023","anchor":"2023"},{"level":2,"heading":"2022","anchor":"2022"},{"level":2,"heading":"2021","anchor":"2021"},{"level":2,"heading":"2020","anchor":"2020"},{"level":2,"heading":"2019","anchor":"2019"},{"level":2,"heading":"2018","anchor":"2018"},{"level":2,"heading":"Meta Museum Notes","anchor":"meta-museum-notes"},{"level":2,"heading":"Test Ideas","anchor":"test-ideas"}],"html":"<h1 id=\"linked-art-bibliography\">Linked Art: Bibliography</h1>\n<p><strong>Last refreshed:</strong> 2026-07-06</p>\n<p>Source: Linked Art bibliography resource list, with project-local summary and implementation notes. This is a project summary; the upstream bibliography and cited works remain authoritative.</p>\n<h2 id=\"purpose\">Purpose</h2>\n<p>The Linked Art bibliography collects scholarly publications, book chapters, technical reports, theses, and research outputs that discuss Linked Art, LOUD, CIDOC-CRM-aligned cultural heritage data, community practice, semantic annotation, and cross-collection discovery.</p>\n<p>This page gives Meta Museum a citation backbone for evaluator-facing claims. It is especially useful when we need to explain why Linked Art, LOUD, IIIF-adjacent practice, provenance modeling, image-archive workflows, and cross-collection discovery are established cultural heritage research directions rather than project-local inventions.</p>\n<h2 id=\"version-context\">Version Context</h2>\n<p>Linked Art 1.0 was officially released in February 2025. Publications from 2024 are close to the stabilized model, while older publications may describe earlier development phases. Use older citations for historical/community context, not as proof of every current 1.0 API detail.</p>\n<h2 id=\"2025\">2025</h2>\n<ul><li>Dressen, A. (2025). Cultural Heritage Data for Research - An Introduction. Open Library of Humanities, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.18710</li><li>Middle, S., Aristeidou, M., Barker, E., Pett, D., &amp; Alcock, S. (2025). Discovering Object Stories: Linking Unstructured Museum Data Through Semantic Annotation. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.273</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2024\">2024</h2>\n<ul><li>Cross, M. (2024). Linked Open Data &amp; Ontology Trends in the Cultural Heritage Sector: Current Projects, Future Directions, and the Case for Provenance [Master&#39;s thesis, University of North Carolina]. https://doi.org/10.17615/7maj-3220</li><li>Daquino, M. (2024). Photo Archives and Linked Open Data. The Added Value. Open Library of Humanities, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.15232</li><li>Hou, Y., &amp; Kenderdine, S. (2024). Ontology-based knowledge representation for traditional martial arts. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae005</li><li>McInerney, P., &amp; O&#39;Neill, B. (2024). The Art of Memory: Archiving Street Art using the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(3), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.177</li><li>Raemy, J. A. (2024). Linked Open Usable Data for Cultural Heritage: Perspectives on Community Practices and Semantic Interoperability [Doctoral Thesis, University of Basel]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14716/148352</li><li>Raemy, J. A., &amp; Sanderson, R. (2024). Analysis of the Usability of Automatically Enriched Cultural Heritage Data. In F. Moral-Andres, E. Merino-Gomez, &amp; P. Reviriego (Eds.), Decoding Cultural Heritage: A Critical Dissection and Taxonomy of Human Creativity through Digital Tools (pp. 69-93). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57675-1_4</li><li>Roberts, R., Abdul Jabbar, J., Dykes, N., Jones, H., Peszko, M., Madella, M., Orengo, H., &amp; Petrie, C. (2024). Historical maps as a multifaceted LOUD resource. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.108595</li><li>Sanderson, R. (2024). Implementing Linked Art in a Multi-Modal Database for Cross-Collection Discovery. Open Library of Humanities, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.15407</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2023\">2023</h2>\n<ul><li>Cornut, M., Raemy, J. A., &amp; Spiess, F. (2023). Annotations as Knowledge Practices in Image Archives: Application of Linked Open Usable Data and Machine Learning. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 16(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625301</li><li>Felsing, U., Fornaro, P., Frischknecht, M., &amp; Raemy, J. A. (2023). Community and Interoperability at the Core of Sustaining Image Archives. Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications, 5(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.5617/dhnbpub.10649</li><li>Manz, M. C., Raemy, J. A., &amp; Fornaro, P. (2023). Recommended 3D Workflow for Digital Heritage Practices. Archiving Conference, 20, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2023.20.1.5</li><li>Raemy, J. A. (2023). Characterising the IIIF and Linked Art Communities: Survey report (p. 29) [Report]. University of Basel. https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep95340</li><li>Raemy, J. A., Gray, T., Collinson, A., &amp; Page, K. R. (2023). Enabling Participatory Data Perspectives for Image Archives through a Linked Art Workflow. In A. Baillot, W. Scholger, T. Tasovac, &amp; G. Vogeler (Eds.), Digital Humanities 2023 Book of Abstracts (Vol. 2023, pp. 515-516). Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations. https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep95099</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2022\">2022</h2>\n<ul><li>Middle, S., Horne, R., McMeekin, D. A., Zuanni, C., &amp; Butterworth, A. (2022). Geographies of Place in Digital Art History. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 16(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2022.0279</li><li>Raemy, J. A. (2022). Ameliorer la valorisation des donnees du patrimoine culturel grace au Linked Open Usable Data (LOUD). In N. Lasolle, O. Bruneau, &amp; J. Lieber (Eds.), Actes des journees humanites numeriques et Web semantique (pp. 132-149). https://doi.org/10.5451/unibas-ep89725</li><li>Rother, L., Koss, M., &amp; Mariani, F. (2022). Taking Care of History: Toward a Politics of Provenance Linked Open Data in Museums. Perspectives on Data. https://www.artic.edu/digital-publications/37/perspectives-on-data/25/taking-care-of-history</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2021\">2021</h2>\n<ul><li>Delmas-Glass, E. (2021). Lessons learned from digital collaborations: Standards and descriptive practices. In L. A. Stuart, T. F. R. Clareson, &amp; J. Ray (Eds.), Economic Considerations for Libraries, Archives and Museums (pp. 61-76). Routledge.</li><li>France, F. G., &amp; Forsberg, A. (2021). Addressing the Challenges of Interoperability and Cultural Heritage Data. Archiving Conference, 18, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2021.1.0.8</li><li>Kotis, K., Angelis, S., Chondrogianni, M., &amp; Marini, E. (2021). Children&#39;s art museum collections as Linked Open Data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/10.1504/IJMSO.2021.117107</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2020\">2020</h2>\n<ul><li>Delmas-Glass, E., &amp; Sanderson, R. (2020). Fostering a community of PHAROS scholars through the adoption of open standards. Art Libraries Journal, 45(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/alj.2019.32</li><li>Page, K. R., Delmas-Glass, E., Beaudet, D., Norling, S., Rother, L., &amp; Hansli, T. (2020). Linked Art: Networking Digital Collections and Scholarship. Digital Humanities 2020 Book of Abstracts, 504-509. https://dh2020.adho.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/139_LinkedArtNetworkingDigitalCollectionsandScholarship.html</li><li>Paquet, A. P. (2020). Linked Data and Linked Open Data Projects for Libraries, Archives and Museums: Constructing Pathways to Information Discovery and Cultural Heritage Sector Collaboration. Johns Hopkins Libraries. http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/63875</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2019\">2019</h2>\n<ul><li>Wildenhaus, K. (2019). The Possibilities of Constructing Linked Data for Art Exhibition Histories. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 38(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1086/702890</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"2018\">2018</h2>\n<ul><li>Alexiev, V. (2018). Museum Linked Open Data: Ontologies, Datasets, Projects. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, 8, 19-50. https://doi.org/10.55630/dipp.2018.8.1</li><li>Fink, E. E. (2018). American Art Collaborative Linked Open Data Initiative (p. 81) [Overview and Recommendations for Good Practices]. American Art Collaborative. https://hdl.handle.net/10088/106410</li><li>Newbury, D. (2018). LOUD: Linked Open Usable Data and linked.art. 2018 CIDOC Conference, 1-11. https://cidoc.mini.icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/03/CIDOC2018_paper_153.pdf</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"meta-museum-notes\">Meta Museum Notes</h2>\n<p>Use the 2024-2025 entries for current Linked Art, LOUD, semantic annotation, provenance, and cross-collection-discovery claims. Use 2018-2023 entries to explain the history of Linked Art, IIIF/Linked Art community practice, PHAROS and American Art Collaborative lineage, image-archive workflows, and broader museum linked-data adoption.</p>\n<p>This bibliography supports evaluator-facing narrative and citations; it should not replace the official Linked Art API/model documentation for exact conformance rules.</p>\n<h2 id=\"test-ideas\">Test Ideas</h2>\n<ul><li>Keep evaluator pages that make broad LOUD/Linked Art claims tied to at least one current bibliography entry.</li><li>Prefer 2024-2025 citations for current conformance or production-readiness claims.</li><li>Use older entries for historical context, community lineage, and research background.</li><li>Keep exact API behavior anchored to the local Linked Art API reference notes rather than bibliography summaries.</li></ul>","updatedAt":"2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z","checksum":"6d9d5160565a46845082eacd063b5a1f62d16adcce883b93ea5c9931695ca83f","checksumPrefix":"6d9d5160565a","anchorCount":12,"lineCount":81,"rawUrl":"/api/docs/content?path=linked-art%2Fapi%2Fbibliography.md","htmlUrl":"/docs?doc=linked-art%2Fapi%2Fbibliography.md","apiUrl":"/api/docs/content?path=linked-art%2Fapi%2Fbibliography.md"}