{"id":"product/connections-editorial-review","relativePath":"product/connections-editorial-review.md","title":"Connections editorial review: Flowers across two centuries","markdown":"# Connections editorial review: Flowers across two centuries\n\nStatus: awaiting human editorial sign-off. Prepared 2026-08-07.\n\nReview the deployed journey at\n[`/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries`](https://www.metamuseum.org/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries)\nand open both cited museum records before completing this form.\n\n## Claim under review\n\nBoth museum records explicitly identify flowers in the work title. The journey\ncompares this documented subject only; it does not claim influence, shared\nmeaning, or a direct historical relationship between the works.\n\n## Human checklist\n\n- [ ] Both displayed titles and dates agree with the cited museum records.\n- [ ] The works belong to two different museum providers.\n- [ ] The claim is limited to documented metadata.\n- [ ] The boundary against influence and shared meaning is clear to a general reader.\n- [ ] “High confidence” describes metadata support, not interpretive certainty.\n- [ ] Each material statement is labeled as fact, inference, or speculation and resolves to its displayed citation.\n- [ ] The method is reproducible from the two declared source records.\n- [ ] Rejected influence and shared-meaning hypotheses are clearly documented.\n- [ ] Novelty remains “not verified” unless a qualified literature review is attached.\n- [ ] The JSON record matches the public story, dossier, citations, review state, and rights boundary.\n- [ ] Rights, source, and onward artwork links remain understandable on mobile and desktop.\n\n## Decision record\n\n- Reviewer:\n- Review date (UTC):\n- Decision (`approved` or `changes-requested`):\n- Notes:\n\nAfter a human completes this record, copy the reviewer and date into\n`src/services/public-connections.ts`, retain the reviewed document as evidence,\nand rerun `tests/services/public-connections.test.ts`. Do not add journey two or\nthree until this decision is approved and the five-session PD0 review is signed.\n\n## Synchronized artifacts\n\n- Public visual story: `/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries`\n- Research dossier: the “Research dossier” section on that page, including method,\n  uncertainties, rejected hypotheses, novelty status, and rights boundary\n- Machine record: `/api/cultural-intelligence/flowers-across-two-centuries`\n\nThe machine record is evaluation-only until commercial terms and the rights of\neach underlying source are reviewed separately. Consent-gated\n`connection_story_completion` and `connection_reuse_interest` signals are kept\noutside the five-event PD0 denominator; institutional usefulness, agent minutes,\neditorial minutes, and novelty verification require attributable review evidence.\n","sections":[{"level":2,"heading":"Claim under review","anchor":"claim-under-review"},{"level":2,"heading":"Human checklist","anchor":"human-checklist"},{"level":2,"heading":"Decision record","anchor":"decision-record"},{"level":2,"heading":"Synchronized artifacts","anchor":"synchronized-artifacts"}],"html":"<h1 id=\"connections-editorial-review-flowers-across-two-centuries\">Connections editorial review: Flowers across two centuries</h1>\n<p>Status: awaiting human editorial sign-off. Prepared 2026-08-07.</p>\n<p>Review the deployed journey at</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.metamuseum.org/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" class=\"doc-link\">`/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries`</a></p>\n<p>and open both cited museum records before completing this form.</p>\n<h2 id=\"claim-under-review\">Claim under review</h2>\n<p>Both museum records explicitly identify flowers in the work title. The journey</p>\n<p>compares this documented subject only; it does not claim influence, shared</p>\n<p>meaning, or a direct historical relationship between the works.</p>\n<h2 id=\"human-checklist\">Human checklist</h2>\n<ul><li>[ ] Both displayed titles and dates agree with the cited museum records.</li><li>[ ] The works belong to two different museum providers.</li><li>[ ] The claim is limited to documented metadata.</li><li>[ ] The boundary against influence and shared meaning is clear to a general reader.</li><li>[ ] “High confidence” describes metadata support, not interpretive certainty.</li><li>[ ] Each material statement is labeled as fact, inference, or speculation and resolves to its displayed citation.</li><li>[ ] The method is reproducible from the two declared source records.</li><li>[ ] Rejected influence and shared-meaning hypotheses are clearly documented.</li><li>[ ] Novelty remains “not verified” unless a qualified literature review is attached.</li><li>[ ] The JSON record matches the public story, dossier, citations, review state, and rights boundary.</li><li>[ ] Rights, source, and onward artwork links remain understandable on mobile and desktop.</li></ul>\n<h2 id=\"decision-record\">Decision record</h2>\n<ul><li>Reviewer:</li><li>Review date (UTC):</li><li>Decision (`approved` or `changes-requested`):</li><li>Notes:</li></ul>\n<p>After a human completes this record, copy the reviewer and date into</p>\n<p>`src/services/public-connections.ts`, retain the reviewed document as evidence,</p>\n<p>and rerun `tests/services/public-connections.test.ts`. Do not add journey two or</p>\n<p>three until this decision is approved and the five-session PD0 review is signed.</p>\n<h2 id=\"synchronized-artifacts\">Synchronized artifacts</h2>\n<p>  uncertainties, rejected hypotheses, novelty status, and rights boundary</p>\n<ul><li>Public visual story: `/connections/flowers-across-two-centuries`</li><li>Research dossier: the “Research dossier” section on that page, including method,</li><li>Machine record: `/api/cultural-intelligence/flowers-across-two-centuries`</li></ul>\n<p>The machine record is evaluation-only until commercial terms and the rights of</p>\n<p>each underlying source are reviewed separately. Consent-gated</p>\n<p>`connection_story_completion` and `connection_reuse_interest` signals are kept</p>\n<p>outside the five-event PD0 denominator; institutional usefulness, agent minutes,</p>\n<p>editorial minutes, and novelty verification require attributable review evidence.</p>","updatedAt":"2018-10-20T01:46:40.000Z","checksum":"55c98d0256035f7d73fb621d1fd998f3446de928ad2502d6436ebb6184a5ce24","checksumPrefix":"55c98d025603","anchorCount":4,"lineCount":53,"rawUrl":"/api/docs/content?path=product%2Fconnections-editorial-review.md","htmlUrl":"/docs?doc=product%2Fconnections-editorial-review.md","apiUrl":"/api/docs/content?path=product%2Fconnections-editorial-review.md"}