Purpose
This scorecard prevents shipped infrastructure from being mistaken for public,
scholarly, or commercial value. An outcome is achieved only when retained
external evidence supports it.
Current state
| Outcome | Current evidence | Status | Next proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| Historically noteworthy research | Primary correspondence in 209SUP/1 connects the 97 × 130 cm Braque's generic and specific titles, Brussels recovery process, and intended restitution; the updated official JDP-0056 record now adds two hashed object images, while a separate 81 × 100 cm lead was responsibly downgraded after a collision search | Stronger object-specific and image-registration finding; novelty, photograph-3492 lineage, and final handover remain unverified | Obtain photograph 3492 or signed September receipt and attributable independent provenance review |
| Useful corrective result | The workbench documents why identical dimensions and superficially overlapping restitution dates cannot establish object identity or contradiction; the correct archive sequence instead separates the 1945 and 1947 questions | Internally supported with retained negative and positive primary evidence | Independent researcher confirms the correction is useful and reproducible |
| Public-interest content | Homepage spotlight and permanent report present the archive case as a four-beat trail; a no-index five-minute study now captures revision-bound open responses locally without self-scoring or direct identifiers | Shipped and visually verified locally; audience value remains unmeasured until genuine files are returned and independently coded | Recruit five eligible adults, retain response files, and complete two-coder review plus adjudication where needed |
| Researcher utility | Frozen dossier, receipts, source links, claim matrix, report API, RSS/JSON feeds, and reproduction protocol now bound to the current dossier and 1947 archive-bridge hash | Shipped; external utility unmeasured | Three genuine researcher sessions and one attributable institutional usefulness review |
| Support revenue | Transparent support offer and attributed CTA/checkout event contract | No confirmed revenue | Activate approved checkout and retain provider-confirmed payment evidence |
| Sponsorship revenue | Transparent three-story introductory offer and sponsor packet | No inquiry or contract evidence | Send a bounded approved offer set and retain inquiry-to-contract outcomes |
| Institutional pilot revenue | Scoped collection-pilot offer and inquiry attribution | No invoice evidence | Conduct qualified conversations and retain accepted scope, invoice, payment, and delivery margin |
Stop rules
Rosenberg primary-document and external-review work advances.
as revenue.
verified, or publication approved.
offers over expanding the provider or agent surface.
- Do not add another general-purpose research or publishing subsystem until the
- Do not describe traffic, CTA clicks, prepared offers, or researched prospects
- Do not describe an AI-generated lead as historically novel, independently
- Prefer improving the public report, testing it with people, and making bounded
Highest-return next actions
- Obtain photograph 3492 or the signed September 1947 restitution receipt.
- Obtain accountable approval for the already personalized, digest-bound recruitment copy, then recruit one independent provenance researcher without implying novelty or organizational endorsement.
- Run five non-specialist report-comprehension sessions.
- Activate a compliant supporter checkout or explicitly decide not to pursue
supporters this cycle.
- Send a small, approved sponsor/pilot offer set and record real outcomes.